ramblings of an aimless mind

Just another Wordpress.com weblog

Posts Tagged ‘technology

Thinking big…while thinking small.

leave a comment »

Ever since people back home got whiff of the fact that I was doing a PhD in “Nanotechnology”, I am usually asked by eager friends and acquaintances about the latest and the greatest in the field. I always start out by saying that “nanotechnology” is in fact too generic a term for anyone to be an expert of,  and I know only a tiny little part of it, before launching into my view on all and sundry. After many a discussion and a talk to the local Rotary club, I thought maybe it would be good to post what I said as a starting point for a series on Nanotechnology. I often find that writing helps to crystallise my thoughts and understand things better, so this endeavour should be educational.

What is it? and why is it different?

A good starting point is to ask what nanotechnology is and what it encompasses. There does not seem to be a definition set in stone, but a commonly accepted (and in this case, heavily paraphrased) one is “any technology that derives its defining feature because some aspect of it is 100 nm or less in dimension“. So a bag of cement which derives some qualities (more strength, less weight etc) from the presence of 50 nm particles inside it is nanotechnology, while the Ipod Nano, however much Apple would like to claim so, is not.

Note: If you are unfamiliar with the nomenclature, a nanometer is a billionth of a meter. A human hair is roughly 50,000 nanometers. That should give a good idea of how small things are.

So what is different with nanotechnology? In the broad context, I would say nothing much is different. The same laws of physics apply as they do to micro, macro and mega-technology (if such words exist). What is different is the relative importance of each law when they act on different materials of different sizes. A good way to think about it is to conduct a thought experiment where we consider that every object is acted upon by gravity and some fictitious force that is pushing it away from the earth. Also assume that the fictitious force has a constant magnitude equal to that which gravity has on a 1kg mass. So how does this situation pan out for objects of different masses? For something human-sized (roughly 70-80Kg), gravity is about 70-80 times stronger and so dominant that the fictitious force will simply not be noticed. As we go to smaller objects, the relative strength of gravity decreases and that of the fictitious force increases. The tipping point is when the mass of the object reaches 1kg. Now both the forces exactly balance out and any object of 1kg will float in space. For objects smaller than 1kg, the fictitious force will be dominant and the the object will start shooting away from the surface of the earth, apparently by its own volition. The ability to float in empty space and shoot off against the pull of gravity may seem magical, but it is simply a change in the balance of forces that causes this apparent magic.

The balance of forces is a very simplistic example and nanotechnological phenomena involve more complicated things, but I find they almost invariably arise from this relative importance of different laws that arise due to small size or mass or specific structure. In my opinion, there are three broad categories that cause nanotechnological materials and devices to get their USP.

New materials.

One of the aspects of nanotechnology is the discovery of new materials that naturally exist at sizes small enough to merit the nanotech label. The classic examples of these are a few carbon based materials, such as carbon nanotubes (CNT), Graphene, Fullerenes etc. They arise out of the propensity of Carbon to form an immensely impressive array or structures (from coal to diamond for instance). CNTs and Graphene are being researched for applications as diverse as improving touchscreens, toughening materials, building electronics, improving battery energy storage and building space elevators.There are still issues with tractability though, and controlling these materials is not easily done.

New uses for known materials.

This is the domain of tweaking known materials such that we alter the balance of forces and tip it into doing what we would like it to.  A good example of such a case is for quantum dots, which are usually made by taking powders of known materials such as lead sulphide (PbS), Cadmium Selenide (CdSe) etc and blitzing them till they are turned into nanometre sized particles.This ultra-tiny size radically changes the properties of the particles vis-a-vis the orginal (mega-sized) powder and makes them more suitable for certain applications. This is a case of an existing material, simply being cast into a different form, so that it takes on different properties and potential applications.

Existing materials in innovation strutures.

Tweaking the balance of forces can also be accomplished by using known materials in innovative strutures rather that simply blitzing them as in the case of quantum dots. A classic example of this is the wing of a Morpho Rhetenor butterfly, a species originating from South America. The wings of this butterfly are shimmering and  brightly coloured, but surprisingly not due to the presence of a dye or any pigmentation. It is in fact due to an elaborate structure of the wing, which involves alternate layers of two different materials, each a few nanometres thick. The thickness of these layers is of a similar magnitude to the wavelengths of incident light and the resulting interaction produces the bright colours that make the butterfly so striking. An exploration into this structure is opening up a whole new area of research focussing on what is known as the “photonic bandgap” and which could have very interesting applications in the future.

So there we have it, my three tier classification of nanotechnology. This is just an introduction, so that the post is long enough to provide information while being short enough to maintain interest. I will examine more detail in further posts as I learn new stuff, which may be tomorrow, the day after, or never, depending on what I am upto otherwise. 🙂

Written by clueso

February 28, 2012 at 7:34 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with ,

Education unchained?

leave a comment »

Some time ago, I blogged about my idea of an education system that separated exams from learning and thereby allowed students to have more liberty in choosing how to get the classroom component of their education while earning their desired qualification. Today I learnt of MIT’s new fully automated course on circuits and electronics. MIT have run the open courseware project for a while now, but it was more of a reference point, where people could sample the lecture notes that MIT uses, but do not get credit for reading the notes or completing the exercises. This course however, offers a certificate for completion, which means that any person, anywhere in the world can now gain an MIT recognition of his/her skills from the comfort of their home.

Arguably, if this course gets a large enough market, someone may start a coaching class to help students understand the material. That would in essence be the separation of the classroom teaching component of education from the exam component, akin to what my old post suggested. Maybe those bright sparks at MIT were reading my blog, though I have my doubts about that.

A fully automated course is nevertheless something noteworthy. I am especially interested in how they handled the lab component. Do they purely use circuit simulators? do they plan to extend the idea in the future where there are accredited venues where students can go to complete the labs? Will the exams be purely multiple choice questions or have they devised a way to have computers grade exam papers? I have enrolled for it, so hopefully sometime in June (when the course ends), I will be able to proudly claim to have a certificate from MIT and also be able to report on my experiences.

While this new development has me excited about the direction education can take in this century,  I can think of a few undesirable implications of rolling out multiple courses or entire degrees through this avenue. Someday soon, I will put those thoughts down too.

Written by clueso

February 14, 2012 at 8:15 am

Removing the “System Tool” malware

leave a comment »

A friend of mine got scared witless when her PC screen suddenly filled up with large red letters claiming it had been infected by just about every known virus/malware in the universe. In addition, a window popped up in the foreground showing a long list of viruses, trojans and worms that had purportedly made their home on her hard drive. Very helpfully she was allowed to “buy” a program that would get rid of all of them. She was prevented from launching any other software and even the task manager which made things tough indeed.

Apparently, this is a “System tool” malware (it has the same name as the helpful program). Removal was fairly simple, simply boot into windows XP safe mode with networking then download and run Malwarebytes’ Anti-Malware to get rid of it. Possibly any other anti malware program will do the job as well, but I am listing this one as I got the name off McAffee forums and it worked.

Hopefully this post will help someone who is stuck with the same issue.

Written by clueso

March 13, 2011 at 6:32 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with , ,

Do we need management?

leave a comment »

I read an interesting article on Technology Review describing how a new company is trying to make predict the success of products by giving the people who directly work on it a pool of imaginary money and asking them bet on the success/failure of each project the company undertakes.

This was first tried in a videogame company where the software engineers bet on the success of all the current projects the company was working on. It is a longish article, but a surprising outcome was that the engineer’s predictions were dramatically more successful than those by the marketing department. Apparently, they also uncovered that as people moved up the hierarchy, their predictions were less accurate. Most amusing was the observation that companies are ignoring this new technique of prediction to protect their “awesome management”.

Here’s a thought. Technology now seems to be able to allow the frontline workers to identify the products most likely to be successful. It also allows them to discuss and float new ideas via social networking and wikis. Finally they are allowing them to sell (eBay. Barnes and Noble self publishing etc). In essence, it is allowing them to takeover the functions of the marketing, creative and sales departments. So will we see a massive number of companies driven completely by the frontline workers? I remember during my time as a software engineer how everyone used to complain about the “awesome management” who supposedly did nothing. Will engineers grasp the nettle and try to go it alone?

I also think that followers of the ideology who advocate ultimate power to the workers should sit up and take notice. It is a fantastic opportunity to adopt cutting edge technology to show how their ideology is feasible and workable.

on the whole, very thought provoking…

Written by clueso

December 10, 2010 at 12:02 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with ,

An Apple a week.

leave a comment »

An undeniable advantage of the PhD life is the opportunity to attend conferences. In my case, I have an additional advantage, namely that my department allows me to borrow a laptop for the duration of the conference. For my last conference, I was handed a sleek Sony Vaio netbook-ish thing. So it was with some expectation that I requested a laptop this time.

Imagine my glee when the person in charge came out and said “we have a Mac for you”. It was something of a “its a boy!!” moment and all day I kept stealing glances at the laptop bag lying next to my chair in office. I was finally going to test drive a Mac for a whole week!!! yippppeee!

Once home, I wasted no time in pulling the laptop out and powering it up. After the bit of whirring and lights blinking, the magic words appeared on the screen.

“Loading Windows 7”.

WTF????WHO would do such a thing???? and for F**K’s sake WHY???? I watched in despair as the familiar multicolour window logo was followed by the desktop with a huge clock in the top right corner.

Thankfully, despite that setback, I managed to figure out that the laptop was dual booting and made it revert to it’s native Mac OSX. Now I was ready for the full Mac experience.

So what do I think of the Mac? The short version is that I am impressed, but not converted. While OSX is nice and shiny, I do not see anything that would massively boost productivity. In fact I miss some of the small features from Windows and Linux that I have started to love, like the “Win+R” shortcut that allows the user to launch a program without having to go through whole menus. Also, I have not managed to find the delete key on the Mac. Whats that about? Does Apple think that people only use the backspace? In all fairness though, I have been using it only for a little while and maybe haven’t figured it out yet.

While the software failed to impress, I have completely fallen for the feel of the laptop. The display is brilliant, keys soft and tactile, mouse pad and button are a pleasure to use and the laptop as a whole has a very durable and sleek look. There are plenty of nice little features like the magnetic clasp on the charger and pretty good battery life that make the MacBook a pleasure to use.

So I did like it, but I am still not prepared to fork out £1000 for a Mac when I could probably get the same hardware for significantly lower. The laptop has another 4 days to convert me 🙂

Written by clueso

September 9, 2010 at 10:58 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with

Learning the difficult way.

leave a comment »

An ancient relic of the computing age, the BBC microcomputer is making a comeback in a retro programming class. The idea being that it will help students understand computers better.

I applaud this decision. Students who are preparing for a programming career must spend some time working with computers that are decidedly not user friendly. Let me rephrase that, they ought to spend some time in user friendless hell, where no GUI exists, all commands are a mile long and have to typed out from memory. Where the error messages are cryptic and you are held to account for the tiniest error.

User friendly operating systems become friendly by abstracting a lot of the processes required to get any task done. While this may be ok for anyone who uses the computer as a tool to get their job done, it may not be the best idea for those whose job it is to know how the things work inside out. Obviously, it will be regressive to say that all GUIs should be scrapped, but spending some time working on extremely constrained and unfriendly computer systems can only be a good thing. It is a bit like working out with weights, not really necessary and a quite a bit of trouble, but beneficial in the long run.

May this initiative last long and thrive

Written by clueso

August 25, 2010 at 10:46 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with ,

Changing display hinges on an Acer Travelmate 4152

with one comment

A few weeks ago my trusty first and only laptop snapped its right display hinge. The plastic bit that covers the hinge started popping out of its socket repeatedly and then one day as I tried to shut the display, the plastic cover shattered, display snapped and stuck out at an alarmingly awkward angle. Quite frightening, especially to someone like me who develops a loyalty to his devices and does not like dumping them.

A bit of searching told me that acer hinges were being sold on ebay and this website had instructions on cracking open an Acer and performing some repairs.  Naturally, I decided to have a go.

The story ends with my laptop hinge being replaced and things pretty much normal again. The plastic hinge cover has well and truly shattered,  so there is an ungainly bit visible on the right side of my laptop, but that’s trivial.

Hopefully the link given above will be of help to others searching for something similar.

Written by clueso

January 29, 2010 at 12:20 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with